Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kumarski's commentslogin

Former NSA Director and retired U.S. Army General Paul Nakasone joined the Board of Directors at OpenAI in June 2024.

OpenAI announced in October 2025 that it would begin allowing the generation of "erotica" and other mature, sexually explicit, or suggestive content for verified adult users on ChatGPT.


A ghoulish company that barely has a moat if it even does.

Avarice is a powerful thing. As is keeping tabs on your citizens.



I am pretty pissed these companies stole ~10 years of my work.

I can't imagine how pissed I'd be if they also stole naked photos of me and used them to generate porn which they claim has no relation to me.


This needs a Roadman accent. Plz.

Awesome stuff.


Americans always think a British accent is exactly one accent.


Americans think a British accent is either "posh snob" or "chimney sweep."

Meanwhile the rest of the world thinks an American accent is either "Travis Bickle" or "Yosemite Sam."


I live in London part of the year.


I do find it odd that ~80% of Americans can't point out Iran on a map.


Illinois has 12 m people and a GDP over $1 trillion. I doubt most foreigners could place it on a map. There is no significant difference that it is part of a federation and Iran is not. People oversell these kind of Instagram sound-bites. It's really not a big deal.

I'd suspect most Americans have a relationship with far-off suffering the same as me: it's sad and I think we should contribute to alleviating it, but if I encounter sufficient sanctimony about it I'd rather go live my life.


The parent comment is provocative and impolite, so you are right to refute it.

On the other hand, I’d like to point out that few countries have foreign policies as obsessed with Illinois as the US government is with Iran.

The average person probably also has no political opinion on Illinois or their governments policy with respect to Illinois, something which I would assume to be different with respect to Iran in the US.


Illinois is not currently supplying drones and rockets to russia. Is not financing terrorist organizations around the world


The problem is: that could be the relation that most Americans have with Iran, but, unfortunately, it's not the relation that USA has with Iran.


Now, compare the cultural history of Illinois and Iran/Persia.

And yes, being a part of federation does make a lot of difference. How many China provinces can you name? (Not even asking you to point them on the map).


No offense but you can't compare a us state to one of the most important and ancient countries on the planet.


I didn't make the metric.

Got downvotes, not sure why.

https://www.newsweek.com/poll-americans-cant-locate-iran-map...


I'm going to buy more.


I was so confused, I thought vercel had an outage. This makes more sense now.

I got 3 different calls from some people today about Vercel and switching off of it, couldn't figure out why - they were spending upwards of 5k-10k/mo.


Funny finding you here. ;)

Hey Orlie.


Hey datarade


Don't have time to reply to everyone. Clearly triggered a lot of programmers here, so I'll try to go point by point.

Electric motors are ~3× more efficient, but the crushing 18:1 energy density disadvantage (170-180 Wh/kg usable vs. 3,200 Wh/kg for jet fuel) creates a physics trap no engineer can escape [1].

A staggering 70.3% of total energy is consumed before the damn thing even moves – manufacturing (35.2%), extraction (19.8%), and processing (15.3%) create an energy debt that makes the whole proposition a joke[2]

Grids: Carbon intensity varies wildly (200-840g CO₂e/kWh), meaning your "clean" electric plane is often dirtier than conventional systems – that's not an opinion, it's EPA data [3].

Real-world performance nightmare is quantified: cold weather operations see a brutal 33% range reduction vs. just 6% for conventional, charging wastes 22.4% operational efficiency, and VTOL applications – which fanboys love to cite – require 2.5-3× more energy per mile than normal flight [4].

We've seen improvements (2.7× EV range increase since 2010), but we're still butting against fundamental chemistry limitations – lithium-ion cathodes achieve only 25-30% of theoretical capacity, and that's a brick wall no amount of startup capital can break through [5].

Synthetic fuels? Give me a break – 10-15% round-trip efficiency means you need 6.7-10× more renewable capacity than direct electrification, basically requiring us to cover half the planet in solar panels [6].

I explicitly acknowledge where electric makes sense (short-haul ferries under 50 miles, puddle-jumper aircraft), while demonstrating why crossing oceans remains physically impossible without a battery chemistry revolution [7].

lithium propulsion systems cost $245-380/kWh delivered vs. $75-110/kWh for conventional systems – that's 3.3× more expensive with no way to close the gap without massive taxpayer subsidies [8].

If this technology truly made economic and environmental sense, why isn't China – which manufactures most of the world's batteries and has the densest transportation networks requiring efficiency – adopting it at scale for their own infrastructure? They desperately need cleaner air and water, have explicitly prioritized environmental improvements in recent policy, and would recognize a truly superior EROI technology before anyone. Their purchase behavior speaks very loud.

[1] Society of Automotive Engineers, Technical Paper 2024-01-0873, https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/20...

[2] Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(1), 120-132, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15309290

[3] EPA eGRID 2023, https://www.epa.gov/egrid

[4] IEEE Transportation Electrification, 10(2), 1582-1593, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=668...

[5] Nature Energy, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-022-01060-5

[6] International Energy Agency, "The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions", https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in...

[7] Maritime Economics & Logistics, 26(2), 112-128, https://link.springer.com/journal/41278

[8] Journal of Transport Economics, 58(2), 234-248, https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-econo...


Full lifecycle comparison included both systems

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-econo...


System-level efficiency negates motor advantage

https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/20...


Hydrogen buses limp at an EROI of 0.5 to 1.5.

Losses via Gibbs free energy (237 kJ/mol to split H2O) and compression (20% of H2’s 120 MJ/kg.)

Barely cash in on the H2-O2 reaction (ΔH = -285.8 kJ/mol).

Battery buses, powered by lithium-ion cells, hit EROI of 2 to 4.

Redox heavy lithium mining (150 MJ/kg) drags it all down.

Charge-discharge losses (90% Coulombic efficiency)+ 5-10% capacity fade after 1000 cycles.

All trails diesel’s 5-10 EROI and 46 MJ/kg density.


By your own calculation EROI of Battery buses should be about 15-30 (taking diesel EROI as given as it has no source) if you actually apply the vehicle's efficiency; ~85% efficiency for E2E diesel-generator-to-EV. While diesel bus would be around ~21% effiency.

Source/explainer: https://youtu.be/6c94vRmbM6Y?si=WmCvyB6uKJT7TWZ7&t=444


Is that hydrogen EROI number assuming lowest energy hydrogen? Or something like electrolysis?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: