Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nikanj's commentslogin

A big reason why Linux runs better than Windows is the absence of Crowdstrike and similar real-time-fuck-shit-up—alyctic engines

Target audience is anyone who will click it. They don’t make money from you installing Linux, they make money from you wanting to read how the switching went

And this is with the Chinese cars handicapped by a double-digit punitive tariff ( https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/news/eu-comm... )

Arguably, China is subsidizing everything with a low currency, though. It may cancel out (or maybe more than cancel out) those tariffs.

And the US has a yearly deficit of what, 2 trillion?

Glass stone houses etc etc.


> Arguably, China is subsidizing everything with a low currency

Not really. "Subsidizing everything" is an oxymoron, if you subsidize some production it must be at the expense of other production that is providing the subsidies.

> It may cancel out (or maybe more than cancel out) those tariffs.

The opposite is true, tariffs reduce demand for Chinese products and thus for Chinese currency, which leads to lower yuan.

If you want higher yuan, remove the tariffs.


They subsidize manufacturing of certain specific industries, EV cars being one, at the cost of domestic consumption. Basically they steal Chinese people's savings and use it to give the rest of the world cheap cars.

> Basically they steal Chinese people's savings and use it to give the rest of the world cheap cars.

One of the fundamental equations of macroeconomics: savings == investment

The high speed of Chinese industrialization is made possible by the high level of savings which are fueled into investments, and that doesn't leave much room for subsidies.

Moreover, even if subsidies do exist, they can be structured in a way that maximizes the bang for the buck of investments and in that light, they assure max productivity - that's not "stealing people's savings" - that's utilizing them in the best way possible for their real purpose: investment.

I don't know why so many people without basic understanding of economics imagine themselves to be experts in it. Yes, mainstream economics is a mess but thinking that you'd fix it with a few shortcuts is hubris.


Do any of the main-stream Linux installers make any attempt at bringing over your files?

I have seen so many ”anyone can switch to Linux” articles, and none of them seem to mention ”all of your files are going to be utterly lost”


This is a non-issue if your files are stored in a partition separate from your OS, and is infeasible otherwise.

* If you have a separate partition, you can replace your OS and your file remain untouched.

* If you don't have a separate partition, your OS and your files will be replaced by the Linux installation. The only way to preserve your files is to copy to some external media before installation. Even if the Linux installer could retain files while reformatting a partition (which might be technically feasible), it would have no way of knowing which files to retain: the user could easily keep important files in arbitrary directories, not just in their designated C:\User\Patrick directory, and they would be understandably irate if the installer promised to keep files but didn't. To say nothing of adding complications of copying files that Windows has pushed to OneDrive.


> This is a non-issue if your files are stored in a partition separate from your OS, and is infeasible otherwise.

That is one of the biggest ifs of 2026. I don't think any major PC laptop vendor has ever sold consumer laptops with anything but one-big-partition layout. For the average user, their files are not stored in any partition, they are stored "right there on my desktop, with a separate folder for photos and bills"


EFI/ESP and a restore partition have been standard or at least common for a decade. Restore partition might be big enough to install to… my Linux system partition is only 30GB.

But yes, been using a /data partition since it was called D:\ under DOS.


What files? Where would the files be originally for this to be a concern? I’ve switched OS many times but I don’t think I’ve ever thought about moving any files.

What desktop OS offers file migration from a different desktop OS during installation on the same machine? Windows and macOS definelty not...

Windows definitely keeps your files right there in your Desktop / Documents folder when you update from Windows 10 to Windows 11.

Like it or not, Aunt Clara is going to expect the same when she "upgrades" to Ubuntu.


Aunt Clara can ask Samantha to make a backup first.

Can I interest you in some new goal posts right over there?

Who in this current political climate hasn't been called a 'terrorist sympathizer'? Feels like 80% of the population qualify

If you take access to knowledge to mean post-secondary tuition, it was also much better 30 years ago

Just a couple of decades ago a common working stiff could buy their family a nice home in any US city.

If you are talking about the 1960s or so, there also were 150 million fewer people in the US? That matters for housing costs.

Some places like Austin, which haven't gone down the NIMBY zoning route, are still somewhat affordable.


The window-dressing is great. You get the votes from the renters because you are doing ”something”, and you get the votes from the landlords because property values remain high

Companies don’t really exist to make products for consumers, they live to create stock value for investors. And the stock market loves AI

The stock market as always been about whatever is the fad in the short term, and whatever produces value in the long term. Today AI is the fad, but investors who care about fundamentals have always cared about pleasing customers because that is where the real value has always come from. (though be careful - not all customers are worth having, some wannabe customers should not be pleased)

The will of the stock market doesn't influence Dell, they're a privately held corporation. They're no longer listed on any public stock market.

Which is probably why Dell admits consumers don't care about AI PCs

As someone pointed out, Dell is 50% owned by Michael Dell. So it's less influenced by this paradigm.

Which is probably why the CEO felt okay to make these comments. I would be very surprised to hear this from someone like Satya Nadella.

"My setup might be surprisingly vanilla! Claude Code works great out of the box, so I personally don't customize it much. "

Well, of course he doesn't need to customize it. It's already working the way he wants it, seeing as how he created it


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: