Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Honestly, they don't even look that great. Lots of sites could be using lots of modern browser features to be fairly innovative from a visual design and user experience standpoint, but it's mostly just really inefficient (and inaccessible, with no compat fallbacks) implementations of the same old shit.


yes lot of these web pages are the size of mp3 files. it's just fucked up.

we decided static html webpages are sooo 1999. Yet it remains the most secure and user friendly medium to deliver value.

bring back the 1999 frame side bar. what was wrong with that?


> bring back the 1999 frame side bar. what was wrong with that?

That's funny. Back in the day, every Real web developer learned that frames are Evil and must be abolished, because they are breaking the back button and now the poor user can't provide a link to the view he sees, because the state of all the frames isn't encoded in the URL.

Then web2.0 happened and all the Cool web devs knew it's the time to start abusing ajax, use modal dialogs, break the back button, and turn simple websites serving text and images into complex stateful web apps and in doing so, ensure that people don't have nice URLs that encode the view they see, for linking.

Hello??


There is making the web more janky and hard to use and making it a simpler page. I think there is a balance here we can find.


I think AMP is that "bring back the 90s movement". No Javascript. Just super light and fast loading webpages like in the good ol' days.

God I miss the late 90s and the internet. Even looking through neocities gives me a pang of nostalgia.

Now everything has to be "Material Design" or "Flat".

¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Everyone thought it was silly when I did that for my site (minimal css, no js, static pages with hugo). But yea I agree, that's the right future for the web and design.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: