> Does this mean somebody has taken the photos and transferred them to tape, and that is what we're seeing here?
More accurately: Photograph -> Videotape -> Edited Videotape -> Laserdisc
> If this _was_ done for archival purposes, what is the likelihood of the original negatives still surviving?
I'm not sure. I hope they do! 35mm resolves to much greater than HD even on cheap/common film stock.
> At which stage was the text box added in?
Definitely once the footage was on videotape and before being stored on a second "edited" videotape since the box is partially distorted in the image I linked to above.
I remember watching a video by Techmoan or Technology Connections or LGR about a system that stored images as video frames on a video disc.
There seems to be no motion blur on that image (from shooting with portable video camera from a moving car), so maybe part of this archive was shot with said technology.
Actually from the site it looks like the digitized copies were saved as - get this - LaserDisc! Kudos to NYC, they decided to go full-on 80's mode for sure.
Indeed it is, but each frame presented here shows distortion consistent with being stored on a tape format at some point in time, definitely prior to LD mastering.
Yes, probably -- before digital cameras, there were still video cameras. They used a CCD to record still video images onto magnetic media such as a video floppy disk. So a lot like a digital camera, but fully analog.
These were pretty cutting-edge tech in the mid 80's and would have made a lot of sense for a project like this.
Oh yeah, plenty of cameras had a "photo" button, that recorded a single frame to like 2 seconds of VHS tape. You could put the tape into a reader, and project or print the photos later.
Checkout this uncropped frame: http://files.80s.nyc/photos/3/05338/0023.jpg