I mostly just wanted to roll my own cross compiler, plus it was easier (for me) to distribute to the network machines that way.
USB DFU is a device class specified by the USB standard. I like the idea of following a standard more than getting locked in to a company because I have only implemented their bootloader protocol.
I've been using the STM32 series Cortex-M3's, and unfortunately ST puts it's own little layer ("DFUSE") on top of DFU.
It would be nice if these companies would just go ahead and conform to some bootloader protocol (USB DFU!) so developers can stop wasting time there trying to talk to boards.
I agree on the bootloader front. I wish they would just settle on a single implementation. NXP's version is however useful, since it requires no tools to operate (delete file from "disk", copy new file to "disk").
USB DFU is a device class specified by the USB standard. I like the idea of following a standard more than getting locked in to a company because I have only implemented their bootloader protocol.
I've been using the STM32 series Cortex-M3's, and unfortunately ST puts it's own little layer ("DFUSE") on top of DFU.
It would be nice if these companies would just go ahead and conform to some bootloader protocol (USB DFU!) so developers can stop wasting time there trying to talk to boards.