Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Anyone recall the story a while back where a bunch of IETF engineers were attending a meeting, and they offered to fix the hotel's flakey wifi? Part of the fix was getting rid of a lot of hotspots, because when you have too many hotspots in an area they interfere with each other and make performance crappy.

Won't the same problem happen if there are too many people trying to run personal hotspots in a given area?



Yes, but you don't fix it by shutting them all down and making people pay for something they could provide themselves. You make it free, 'cos it's the Olympics and people need to communicate freely.

ps. wasn't my downvote, I think they're useless

edit-- well it seems you removed the part of your comment that called out your down-voter and now i seem pedantic


making people pay for something they could provide themselves

They could. At the expense of everyone else around them.

You make it free, 'cos it's the Olympics and people need to communicate freely.

Go to a club on Thursday night (Thirsty Thursday) and try to have a conversation with your friend. The same thing happens with wifi. Considering the amount of wifi equipment used by the teams at the Olympics, I think it's more pragmatic for the IOC to heavily regulate the spectrum to be sure the coaches can do their job. When it's all said and done, the spirit of the Olympics is about the athletes, not the fans.


Making everyone pay isn't a solution, it's a business plan.

When I go out to a loud club I can still communicate and no one comes around telling me it's against the club rules to try to.

The Olympics would be nothing without our ability to communicate about them. IMHO that's one of the biggest failings of NBC this year. They're doing a horrible job of communicating the Olympics. Opening up the communication channels just brings more interest, more coverage and more excitement.


True, but how many people (apart from journos, who are almost certainly going to already have a separate wifi network provided) really need to be using their laptops to communicate from within the Olympic site? If you want to tweet or whatever, the chances are that you'll already have a smartphone with you that you can do that from.

The NBC debacle is a big deal, and if I was American it would have a big impact on my enjoyment. But this is vastly different, and I'm not finding my enjoyment affected one bit by this ban (I doubt that I will be bothered when I'm down there next week either).


Considering how many people are visiting from foreign countries I would assume Skype or other video conferencing solutions to be vary popular.


If you're coming from a foreign country, you've probably got a foreign phone/data contract, and probably don't want to be streaming huge amounts of data over it at roaming rates.


I would believe that was the reason if they hadn't also banned competitors to all their other sponsors. French fries don't cause interference.

I used to love the Olympics. Stuff like this has made me hate it.


Need the same guys to go to the Olympics and do the reverse; jamm all the signals!

That was a great story.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: