> Most stories are BS.

Maybe in your bubble that's true.

> There is no requirement to presume/assume "good faith".

You're not answering anything with substance. Yes, it's a convienent strategy to assume everything is fake news when it doesn't fit your narrative. But that's not reality and it's pretty obvious that you're deflecting.

> Do you accept part or all of the entire post as factual?

Yes, he's an independent journalist that's reported on some big stories this year already. Given the actions against civil rights we've seen already from this administration, sending FBI agents to ask questions is certainly tame by comparison and very plausible.

Yes most stories spread by magas are bullshit. But this is not maga that reported this.

It's unverified BS.

what happened to "The Five W's" in journalism: "Who, what, where, when, and why"?