Seems more like a brain fart than an error in understanding, especially because he didn't highlight why it was important to have unbiasedness in the first place. Having to explain the unbiased estimator for standard deviation would probably not have contributed much. It's more of a technicality than anything of philosophical importance--the square root of the unbiased estimator of sample variance is pretty accurate.
The usage of n-1 instead of n in the denominator was a question I was always asked when I TA'ed for intro statistics classes in grad school. An explanation of unbiasedness might be warranted if this is to be an introductory primer.
The usage of n-1 instead of n in the denominator was a question I was always asked when I TA'ed for intro statistics classes in grad school. An explanation of unbiasedness might be warranted if this is to be an introductory primer.